The Vagueness Is All
From Volume 2, Number 2, April 1993 issue of The
“Quote... Unquote” Newsletter
I think it was George Bernard Shaw who said ‘Only fools use
quotations.’ In fact, I know it wasn’t George
Bernard Shaw who said that. I am merely following the custom
adopted by so many who are called upon to speak or write. The
names Oscar Wilde, Winston Churchill, or Mark Twain, Abraham
Lincoln (and for a period, not so long ago, Orson Welles) may be
substituted for Shaw’s, but the form remains the same. Notice
particularly the use of ‘I think.’ This is inserted to give the
speaker the air of a man who is familiar with everything worth
quoting but does not wish to appear too effortlessly
knowledgeable. In all probability the speaker had no idea that
Shaw, Wilde, Churchill, Lincoln, Twain or Welles had ever said
any such thing until, shortly before standing up to speak, he
opened a dictionary of quotations. No matter. He decided to start
with a quotation in order to lend his theme dignity and himself
with a whiff of erudition. The choice of Shaw is instructive,
however. He is an OK name to quote. So much so that even if
G.B.S. never uttered anything remotely similar it is possible to
get away with quoting remarks he never made.
Hence, Rees’s First Law of Quotation: ‘When in doubt,
ascribe all quotations to George Bernard Shaw.’ The law’s first
qualification is: ‘Except when they obviously derive from
Shakespeare, the Bible or Kipling.’ The corollary is: ‘In time,
all humorous remarks will be ascribed to Shaw whether he said
them or not.’
Why should this be? People are notoriously lax about quoting and
attributing remarks correctly, as witness an analogous process I
shall call Churchillian Drift. The Drift is almost
indistinguishable from the First Law, but there is a subtle
difference. Whereas quotations with an apothegmatic feel are
normally ascribed to Shaw, those with a more grandiose or
belligerent tone are almost automatically credited to Churchill.
All quotations in translation, on the other hand, should be
attributed to Goethe (with ‘I think’ obligatory).
Shaw, Churchill, Wilde, Lincoln and Twain are, in fact, fixed in
the popular mind as practically the sole source of witty and
quotable sayings. But what is alarming is the way in which almost
any remark not obviously tied to some other originator will one
day find itself attributed to one of these five.
An item in the first of my Quote...Unquote books gave rise
to an example of pseudo-Churchillian Drift which did
not unusually involve any of the Big Five. I had included a
remark noted down after seeing a performance of Alan Bennett’s
play Forth Years On. I emphasize ‘noted down’ because it
does not appear in the play’s printed text: ‘Sidney and Beatrice
Webb two of the nicest people if ever there was one.’ Imagine my
amusement when I came across this line, subsequently, in someone
else’s anthology attributed to Arnold Bennett. Clearly,
the second anthologist either misread his own
handwriting or he was afflicted to an attack of Churchillian
Drift. ‘Somehow’, he may have thought to himself, ‘this
unfamiliar line needs to be ascribed to someone rather more
venerable (and more dead) than Alan Bennett. What could be more
appropriate than to stick it on Arnold Bennett (a
contemporary of Shaw, Churchill, Wilde and Twain, to boot)?
Incidentally, quite how Orson Welles found his way into the
pantheon, I’m not so sure. Because of his Falstaffian stature? In
1977, Kenneth Williams, the late comic actor, appeared on radio
Quote...Unquote and told how Welles had said of Donny
Osmond, then a prominent pop star, ‘He has Van Gogh’s ear for
music.’ In fact it was Billy Wilder who had said this
about Cliff Osmond an actor who appeared in a number of
Wilder’s films and had then been asked to sing for the first
time. But behold the process at work: Welles is still, to the
general public, a better known film director than Wilder; Donny
Osmond is much better known than poor Cliff.
Having written all this, I am only too aware that I am open to
Rees’s Second Law of Quotation: ‘However sure you are that
you have attributed a quotation correctly, an earlier source will
be pointed out to you.’ For example, in that first
Quote...Unquote book (1978) I also stated that Somerset
Maugham took the title of his novel Cakes and Ale from
Shakespeare’s Twelfth Night. In no time at all, I received a
letter from a reader pointing out that the phrase occurs in a
papyrus dated c 1,000-900 BC: ‘Grant ye cakes and ale and oxen
and feathered fowl to Osiris.’ I was duly mortified but I have
a suspicion that Maugham didn’t know that either. Even when a
quotation has become firmly yoked to a particular source, there
is always someone to put you right about it. Again in that first
Quote...Unquote book I included Churchill’s
description of Clement Attlee as ‘a sheep in sheep’s clothing’.
Later I discovered that Churchill himself had corrected
this he claimed he had said it about Ramsay MacDonald (rather
more to the point, be it said). Then along came another
phrase-detective who asserted that even if Churchill had
expressed the sentiment about either gentleman, he had been
taking unto himself a phrase originated by J.B. Morton, alias
‘Beachcomber.’ Without re-reading the whole of Beachcomber a
pleasant enough task, to be sure I am unable to say if this is
so. But it seems quite feasible, even if that would make it more
a case of Churchillian Grab than Churchillian Drift. It
stands to reason that when a bon mot is first uttered, a
lot depends on the hearing and memory of those present or the
truthfulness and accuracy of the man who disseminates his own
bon mots (Oscar Wilde was a dab hand at this, so they
say). Yet even when words are actually broadcast on radio or
television, error is likely to creep in.
In fact, strictly speaking, one ought to append to every
quotation a covering note of deliberate and vague periphrasis: ‘I
am not saying it was Shaw/Wilde/Twain who said this...I am
merely suggesting that sources would support the view that
thingummy is one of a number of possible options as to who might
have been associated with the above remark at one time or
another.’ I look forward to this catching on.
Copyright © 1993 Nigel Rees
|